Canon RF 85mm F1.2 L USM vs. Canon RF 85mm F2 MACRO IS STM
Pick the 85mm f/1.2 if you want about 67% more background blur, pick the 85mm f/2 if you want closer focus. Compare both side by side.
Try true patent ray-tracing:
Matching lenses from each maker's lineup, plus some classic medium and large format lenses. Email me if something is wrong or missing.
Questions
Which blurs the background more, Canon RF 85mm F1.2 L USM or Canon RF 85mm F2 MACRO IS STM?
At the same subject framing, distant background blur scales with the entrance pupil diameter (focal length ÷ f-number). Canon RF 85mm F1.2 L USM at f/1.2 has a 70.8 mm entrance pupil, while Canon RF 85mm F2 MACRO IS STM at f/2 has a 42.5 mm entrance pupil.
How does working distance differ between Canon RF 85mm F1.2 L USM and Canon RF 85mm F2 MACRO IS STM?
For an upper-body portrait, Canon RF 85mm F1.2 L USM stands 3.41 m from the subject (sharp zone 17 cm, from 3.33 m to 3.49 m), whereas Canon RF 85mm F2 MACRO IS STM stands 3.41 m away (sharp zone 28 cm, from 3.27 m to 3.55 m).
How do the optical designs of Canon RF 85mm F1.2 L USM and Canon RF 85mm F2 MACRO IS STM compare?
Canon RF 85mm F1.2 L USM uses 14 elements in 9 groups (US20200012073A1, effective focal length 88.4 mm at portrait distance). Canon RF 85mm F2 MACRO IS STM uses 12 elements in 11 groups (US20210072505A1, effective focal length 88.6 mm).
Explore individual lens ray-tracers
Head-to-head lens comparisons
All lens comparisons
Also see: depth of field, bokeh, crop factor, lens compression.