Fujifilm XF 16mm F1.4 R WR vs. Fujifilm XF 23mm F1.4 R LM WR
Pick the 16mm f/1.4 if you want a wider field of view, pick the 23mm f/1.4 if you want about 44% more background blur. Compare both side by side.
Try true patent ray-tracing:
Matching lenses from each maker's lineup, plus some classic medium and large format lenses. Email me if something is wrong or missing.
Questions
Which blurs the background more, Fujifilm XF 16mm F1.4 R WR or Fujifilm XF 23mm F1.4 R LM WR?
At the same subject framing, distant background blur scales with the entrance pupil diameter (focal length ÷ f-number). Fujifilm XF 16mm F1.4 R WR at f/1.4 has a 11.4 mm entrance pupil, while Fujifilm XF 23mm F1.4 R LM WR at f/1.4 has a 16.4 mm entrance pupil.
How does working distance differ between Fujifilm XF 16mm F1.4 R WR and Fujifilm XF 23mm F1.4 R LM WR?
For an upper-body portrait, Fujifilm XF 16mm F1.4 R WR stands 1.01 m from the subject (sharp zone 33 cm, from 87 cm to 1.20 m), whereas Fujifilm XF 23mm F1.4 R LM WR stands 1.42 m away (sharp zone 32 cm, from 1.28 m to 1.60 m).
How do the optical designs of Fujifilm XF 16mm F1.4 R WR and Fujifilm XF 23mm F1.4 R LM WR compare?
Fujifilm XF 16mm F1.4 R WR uses 13 elements in 11 groups (US20160282590A1, effective focal length 16.0 mm at portrait distance). Fujifilm XF 23mm F1.4 R LM WR uses 15 elements in 10 groups (US20220276464A1, effective focal length 22.3 mm).
Explore individual lens ray-tracers
Head-to-head lens comparisons
All lens comparisons
Also see: depth of field, bokeh, crop factor, lens compression.