Fujifilm XF 18mm F1.4 R LM WR vs. Fujifilm XF 18mm F2 R
Pick the 18mm f/1.4 if you want about 43% more background blur, pick the 18mm f/2 if you want a wider field of view. Compare both side by side.
Try true patent ray-tracing:
Matching lenses from each maker's lineup, plus some classic medium and large format lenses. Email me if something is wrong or missing.
Questions
Which blurs the background more, Fujifilm XF 18mm F1.4 R LM WR or Fujifilm XF 18mm F2 R?
At the same subject framing, distant background blur scales with the entrance pupil diameter (focal length ÷ f-number). Fujifilm XF 18mm F1.4 R LM WR at f/1.4 has a 12.9 mm entrance pupil, while Fujifilm XF 18mm F2 R at f/2 has a 9.0 mm entrance pupil.
How does working distance differ between Fujifilm XF 18mm F1.4 R LM WR and Fujifilm XF 18mm F2 R?
For an upper-body portrait, Fujifilm XF 18mm F1.4 R LM WR stands 1.13 m from the subject (sharp zone 32 cm, from 99 cm to 1.31 m), whereas Fujifilm XF 18mm F2 R stands 1.13 m away (sharp zone 47 cm, from 94 cm to 1.41 m).
How do the optical designs of Fujifilm XF 18mm F1.4 R LM WR and Fujifilm XF 18mm F2 R compare?
Fujifilm XF 18mm F1.4 R LM WR uses 15 elements in 9 groups (US20220011542A1, effective focal length 18.0 mm at portrait distance). Fujifilm XF 18mm F2 R uses 8 elements in 7 groups (US20140240851A1, effective focal length 17.4 mm).
Explore individual lens ray-tracers
Head-to-head lens comparisons
All lens comparisons
Also see: depth of field, bokeh, crop factor, lens compression.