Fujifilm XF 23mm F2 R WR vs. Fujifilm XF 27mm F2.8 R WR
Pick the 23mm f/2 if you want about 19% more background blur, pick the 27mm f/2.8 if you want less background blur. Compare both side by side.
Try true patent ray-tracing:
Matching lenses from each maker's lineup, plus some classic medium and large format lenses. Email me if something is wrong or missing.
Questions
Which blurs the background more, Fujifilm XF 23mm F2 R WR or Fujifilm XF 27mm F2.8 R WR?
At the same subject framing, distant background blur scales with the entrance pupil diameter (focal length ÷ f-number). Fujifilm XF 23mm F2 R WR at f/2 has a 11.5 mm entrance pupil, while Fujifilm XF 27mm F2.8 R WR at f/2.8 has a 9.6 mm entrance pupil.
How does working distance differ between Fujifilm XF 23mm F2 R WR and Fujifilm XF 27mm F2.8 R WR?
For an upper-body portrait, Fujifilm XF 23mm F2 R WR stands 1.42 m from the subject (sharp zone 46 cm, from 1.23 m to 1.69 m), whereas Fujifilm XF 27mm F2.8 R WR stands 1.67 m away (sharp zone 64 cm, from 1.41 m to 2.04 m).
How do the optical designs of Fujifilm XF 23mm F2 R WR and Fujifilm XF 27mm F2.8 R WR compare?
Fujifilm XF 23mm F2 R WR uses 10 elements in 6 groups (US20170351051A1, effective focal length 22.8 mm at portrait distance). Fujifilm XF 27mm F2.8 R WR uses 7 elements in 5 groups (US20160011404A1, effective focal length 27.1 mm).
Explore individual lens ray-tracers
Head-to-head lens comparisons
All lens comparisons
Also see: depth of field, bokeh, crop factor, lens compression.