Leica Noctilux-M 50mm f/0.95 ASPH. vs. Leica NOCTILUX 50mm f/1.2 ASPH
Pick the 50mm f/0.95 if you want about 26% more background blur, pick the 50mm f/1.2 if you want rounder highlights when stopped down.
Try true patent ray-tracing:
Matching lenses from each maker's lineup, plus some classic medium and large format lenses. Email me if something is wrong or missing.
Questions
Which blurs the background more, Leica Noctilux-M 50mm f/0.95 ASPH. or Leica NOCTILUX 50mm f/1.2 ASPH?
At the same subject framing, distant background blur scales with the entrance pupil diameter (focal length ÷ f-number). Leica Noctilux-M 50mm f/0.95 ASPH. at f/0.95 has a 52.6 mm entrance pupil, while Leica NOCTILUX 50mm f/1.2 ASPH at f/1.2 has a 41.7 mm entrance pupil.
How does working distance differ between Leica Noctilux-M 50mm f/0.95 ASPH. and Leica NOCTILUX 50mm f/1.2 ASPH?
For an upper-body portrait, Leica Noctilux-M 50mm f/0.95 ASPH. stands 2.01 m from the subject (sharp zone 14 cm, from 1.95 m to 2.08 m), whereas Leica NOCTILUX 50mm f/1.2 ASPH stands 2.01 m away (sharp zone 17 cm, from 1.93 m to 2.10 m).
How do the optical designs of Leica Noctilux-M 50mm f/0.95 ASPH. and Leica NOCTILUX 50mm f/1.2 ASPH compare?
Leica Noctilux-M 50mm f/0.95 ASPH. uses 14 elements in 11 groups (US20150192839A1, effective focal length 51.7 mm at portrait distance). Leica NOCTILUX 50mm f/1.2 ASPH uses 7 elements in 5 groups (DE1045120B, effective focal length 50.9 mm).
Explore individual lens ray-tracers
Head-to-head lens comparisons
All lens comparisons
Also see: depth of field, bokeh, crop factor, lens compression.