Nikon NIKKOR Z 28mm f/2.8 vs. Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2
Pick the 28mm f/2.8 if you want a wider field of view, pick the 40mm f/2 if you want about 100% more background blur. Compare both side by side.
Try true patent ray-tracing:
Matching lenses from each maker's lineup, plus some classic medium and large format lenses. Email me if something is wrong or missing.
Questions
Which blurs the background more, Nikon NIKKOR Z 28mm f/2.8 or Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2?
At the same subject framing, distant background blur scales with the entrance pupil diameter (focal length ÷ f-number). Nikon NIKKOR Z 28mm f/2.8 at f/2.8 has a 10.0 mm entrance pupil, while Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 at f/2 has a 20.0 mm entrance pupil.
How does working distance differ between Nikon NIKKOR Z 28mm f/2.8 and Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2?
For an upper-body portrait, Nikon NIKKOR Z 28mm f/2.8 stands 1.15 m from the subject (sharp zone 42 cm, from 97 cm to 1.40 m), whereas Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 stands 1.62 m away (sharp zone 29 cm, from 1.49 m to 1.78 m).
How do the optical designs of Nikon NIKKOR Z 28mm f/2.8 and Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 compare?
Nikon NIKKOR Z 28mm f/2.8 uses 10 elements in 8 groups (WO2022071249A1, effective focal length 27.5 mm at portrait distance). Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 uses 8 elements in 4 groups (JP2021-189351A, effective focal length 39.0 mm).
Explore individual lens ray-tracers
Head-to-head lens comparisons
All lens comparisons
Also see: depth of field, bokeh, crop factor, lens compression.