Canon 50mm f/0.95 vs. Canon 50mm f/1.0 L
Pick the 50mm f/0.95 if you want about 5% more background blur, pick the 50mm f/1 if you want closer focus. Compare both side by side.
Try true patent ray-tracing:
Matching lenses from each maker's lineup, plus some classic medium and large format lenses. Email me if something is wrong or missing.
Questions
Which blurs the background more, Canon 50mm f/0.95 or Canon 50mm f/1.0 L?
At the same subject framing, distant background blur scales with the entrance pupil diameter (focal length ÷ f-number). Canon 50mm f/0.95 at f/0.95 has a 52.6 mm entrance pupil, while Canon 50mm f/1.0 L at f/1 has a 50.0 mm entrance pupil.
How does working distance differ between Canon 50mm f/0.95 and Canon 50mm f/1.0 L?
For an upper-body portrait, Canon 50mm f/0.95 stands 2.01 m from the subject (sharp zone 14 cm, from 1.95 m to 2.08 m), whereas Canon 50mm f/1.0 L stands 2.01 m away (sharp zone 14 cm, from 1.95 m to 2.09 m).
How do the optical designs of Canon 50mm f/0.95 and Canon 50mm f/1.0 L compare?
Canon 50mm f/0.95 uses 7 elements in 5 groups (US2836102A, effective focal length 51.8 mm at portrait distance). Canon 50mm f/1.0 L uses 11 elements in 9 groups (US4717245A, effective focal length 49.3 mm).
Explore individual lens ray-tracers
Head-to-head lens comparisons
All lens comparisons
Also see: depth of field, bokeh, crop factor, lens compression.