Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM vs. Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
Pick the 50mm f/1.4 if you want about 29% more background blur, pick the 50mm f/1.8 if you want less background blur. Compare both side by side.
Try true patent ray-tracing:
Matching lenses from each maker's lineup, plus some classic medium and large format lenses. Email me if something is wrong or missing.
Questions
Which blurs the background more, Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM or Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II?
At the same subject framing, distant background blur scales with the entrance pupil diameter (focal length ÷ f-number). Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM at f/1.4 has a 35.7 mm entrance pupil, while Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II at f/1.8 has a 27.8 mm entrance pupil.
How does working distance differ between Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM and Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II?
For an upper-body portrait, Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM stands 2.01 m from the subject (sharp zone 20 cm, from 1.92 m to 2.12 m), whereas Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II stands 2.01 m away (sharp zone 26 cm, from 1.89 m to 2.15 m).
How do the optical designs of Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM and Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II compare?
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM uses 7 elements in 6 groups (JP H06-242370A, effective focal length 50.2 mm at portrait distance). Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II uses 6 elements in 5 groups (JP S62-087922A, effective focal length 50.7 mm).
Explore individual lens ray-tracers
Head-to-head lens comparisons
All lens comparisons
Also see: depth of field, bokeh, crop factor, lens compression.