Nikon NIKKOR Z 135mm f/1.8 S Plena vs. Nikon AF DC 135mm f/2D
Pick the 135mm f/1.8 if you want about 11% more background blur, pick the 135mm f/2 if you want less background blur. Compare both side by side.
Try true patent ray-tracing:
Matching lenses from each maker's lineup, plus some classic medium and large format lenses. Email me if something is wrong or missing.
Questions
Which blurs the background more, Nikon NIKKOR Z 135mm f/1.8 S Plena or Nikon AF DC 135mm f/2D?
At the same subject framing, distant background blur scales with the entrance pupil diameter (focal length ÷ f-number). Nikon NIKKOR Z 135mm f/1.8 S Plena at f/1.8 has a 75.0 mm entrance pupil, while Nikon AF DC 135mm f/2D at f/2 has a 67.5 mm entrance pupil.
How does working distance differ between Nikon NIKKOR Z 135mm f/1.8 S Plena and Nikon AF DC 135mm f/2D?
For an upper-body portrait, Nikon NIKKOR Z 135mm f/1.8 S Plena stands 5.40 m from the subject (sharp zone 25 cm, from 5.28 m to 5.53 m), whereas Nikon AF DC 135mm f/2D stands 5.40 m away (sharp zone 28 cm, from 5.27 m to 5.55 m).
How do the optical designs of Nikon NIKKOR Z 135mm f/1.8 S Plena and Nikon AF DC 135mm f/2D compare?
Nikon NIKKOR Z 135mm f/1.8 S Plena uses 16 elements in 14 groups (WO2024147268A1, effective focal length 130.2 mm at portrait distance). Nikon AF DC 135mm f/2D uses 7 elements in 6 groups (US4908639A, effective focal length 131.0 mm).
Explore individual lens ray-tracers
Head-to-head lens comparisons
All lens comparisons
Also see: depth of field, bokeh, crop factor, lens compression.