Canon RF 135mm F1.8 L IS USM vs. Nikon NIKKOR Z 135mm f/1.8 S Plena

Pick the 135mm f/1.8 L if you want closer focus, pick the 135mm f/1.8 S if you want rounder highlights when stopped down. Compare both side by side.

Loading scene…
0%

Portrait At-a-Glance Comparison (Upper Body Framing)

Optical & Portrait Metric Canon RF 135mm F1.8 L IS USM Nikon NIKKOR Z 135mm f/1.8 S Plena What It Means in Practice
Upper-Body Working Distance 5.40 m 5.40 m Identical working distance—both frame an upper-body portrait from the exact same spot.
Background Field of View (Compression) 15° 16° Identical 15° horizontal background view behind the subject.
Entrance Pupil Diameter 75.0 mm (f/1.8) 75.0 mm (f/1.8) Nearly identical distant background blur size at equal framing.
Corner Bokeh Roundness (90% Field) 62% (-0.6 EV) 100% (0.0 EV) Nikon NIKKOR Z 135mm f/1.8 S Plena keeps significantly rounder bokeh balls into the corners wide open (100% vs. 62% roundness).
Effective Focal Length (Breathing) 132.7 mm (-1.7%) 130.2 mm (-3.6%) At 5.4 m, Canon RF 135mm F1.8 L IS USM frames like a 132.7 mm lens while Nikon NIKKOR Z 135mm f/1.8 S Plena frames like a 130.2 mm lens.
Depth of Field (Sharp Zone) 25 cm (5.28 m – 5.53 m) 25 cm (5.28 m – 5.53 m) Both lenses deliver the exact same 25 cm sharp focus zone.
Minimum Focus Distance 0.7 m 0.82 m Canon RF 135mm F1.8 L IS USM focuses 12 cm closer (0.7 m vs. 0.82 m) for tighter close-ups.

Questions

Which blurs the background more, Canon RF 135mm F1.8 L IS USM or Nikon NIKKOR Z 135mm f/1.8 S Plena?

At the same subject framing, distant background blur scales with the entrance pupil diameter (focal length ÷ f-number). Canon RF 135mm F1.8 L IS USM at f/1.8 has a 75.0 mm entrance pupil, while Nikon NIKKOR Z 135mm f/1.8 S Plena at f/1.8 has a 75.0 mm entrance pupil.

How does working distance differ between Canon RF 135mm F1.8 L IS USM and Nikon NIKKOR Z 135mm f/1.8 S Plena?

For an upper-body portrait, Canon RF 135mm F1.8 L IS USM stands 5.40 m from the subject (sharp zone 25 cm, from 5.28 m to 5.53 m), whereas Nikon NIKKOR Z 135mm f/1.8 S Plena stands 5.40 m away (sharp zone 25 cm, from 5.28 m to 5.53 m).

How do the optical designs of Canon RF 135mm F1.8 L IS USM and Nikon NIKKOR Z 135mm f/1.8 S Plena compare?

Canon RF 135mm F1.8 L IS USM uses 17 elements in 12 groups (US20230213745A1, effective focal length 132.7 mm at portrait distance). Nikon NIKKOR Z 135mm f/1.8 S Plena uses 16 elements in 14 groups (WO2024147268A1, effective focal length 130.2 mm).

Explore individual lens ray-tracers

Head-to-head lens comparisons

All lens comparisons

Also see: depth of field, bokeh, crop factor, lens compression.