Canon RF 35mm F1.4 L VCM vs. Canon RF 35mm F1.8 MACRO IS STM
Pick the 35mm f/1.4 if you want about 29% more background blur, pick the 35mm f/1.8 if you want closer focus. Compare both side by side.
Try true patent ray-tracing:
Matching lenses from each maker's lineup, plus some classic medium and large format lenses. Email me if something is wrong or missing.
Questions
Which blurs the background more, Canon RF 35mm F1.4 L VCM or Canon RF 35mm F1.8 MACRO IS STM?
At the same subject framing, distant background blur scales with the entrance pupil diameter (focal length ÷ f-number). Canon RF 35mm F1.4 L VCM at f/1.4 has a 25.0 mm entrance pupil, while Canon RF 35mm F1.8 MACRO IS STM at f/1.8 has a 19.4 mm entrance pupil.
How does working distance differ between Canon RF 35mm F1.4 L VCM and Canon RF 35mm F1.8 MACRO IS STM?
For an upper-body portrait, Canon RF 35mm F1.4 L VCM stands 1.42 m from the subject (sharp zone 20 cm, from 1.33 m to 1.53 m), whereas Canon RF 35mm F1.8 MACRO IS STM stands 1.42 m away (sharp zone 26 cm, from 1.30 m to 1.56 m).
How do the optical designs of Canon RF 35mm F1.4 L VCM and Canon RF 35mm F1.8 MACRO IS STM compare?
Canon RF 35mm F1.4 L VCM uses 11 elements in 9 groups (JP H11-211978A, effective focal length 34.7 mm at portrait distance). Canon RF 35mm F1.8 MACRO IS STM uses 11 elements in 9 groups (US20190113711A1, effective focal length 34.8 mm).
Explore individual lens ray-tracers
Head-to-head lens comparisons
All lens comparisons
Also see: depth of field, bokeh, crop factor, lens compression.